Menu

Hunting Legendary Creatures And Biblical Dragons In Central Africa

Since the aurochs had been real and had lived in a land far-removed from Babylon, Ley argued the same must be true for the other creature on the Gate. Some versions of the Book of Daniel included an encounter with a dragon before the more infamous exploit in the lion’s den, and Ley believed this must also refer to a sirrush. His thinking was further bolstered by the belief that premodern people hadn’t known that species could change or go extinct, an assumption that has been challenged since the 1990s. Since the Babylonians couldn’t have drawn the sirrush from fossils, they must have drawn it from real life. It was clear to Ley that the sirrush, the Biblical dragon, the mokele-mbembe, and Hagenbeck’s brontosaurus were all the same creature. It all fit together for him… (READ MORE)


THE BIGGEST CASH GIVEAWAY IN OUR HISTORY! TWO $10,000.00 WINNERS PLUS 20 MORE!

Category: News

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!